It is widely understood that relationship
between economic or market development is a major trend in the global era.
In such relationship, the role of law in regulating the dynamics and
impacts of developmental processes is indispensable.
Essentially, the main purposes
of economic development are accelerating economic growth and reducing poverty.
It is undisputable that during the “Post Welfare State” in 21st
century, market development constitutes an inevitable phenomenon. As a part of
whole development, and in order to be able to achieve those purposes, market
development need to be promoted and supported through effective institution
and appropriate regulation (law). Therefore, outstanding institution and
fairness of law are fundamental precondition to make the market
development work successfully. In this sense, we could judge that law and
institution have positive contribution to economic aspect when the
opportunities for poor people expand, competition can spur the market actors’
innovation, and there is an equal distribution of assets among societies. At
the same time, some obstacles such as transaction cost and barrier to entry
the market for new participant ought to be minimized.
Regarding with the institutional
aspect, there are at least two types of market- supporting institutions,
those are, public and private institution. From another perspective, we can
also categorize institution as either formal or informal institution. Public
institution is reflected by governmental agencies, which usually has formal
principle and mechanism. Meanwhile, private institution composes of business or
community actors, and players in international markets. In the case of MITI of
Japan, although it is a public institution, it does not employ formal or
command principle. In arranging and energizing the market processes, MITI
combine the command principle and the community principle based on social
norms. It means that MITI never implement ‘top-down’ approaches, and arrange an
administrative guideline (gyoseishidou) by persuading and facilitating
economic actors instead.
The other important aspect is
law. To comprehend more easily the role of law in arranging economic or market,
we can classify it into two categories; internally and externally. Internal
role means that law gives an unambiguous regulation to a certain company and
all activities conducting in that company. The aim of this legal guideline is
to promote good corporate governance. Basically, there are four types of
business organizations or companies: sole proprietorship, partnership,
corporation, and associated enterprise. Among those, corporation can be stated
as a special type for its limited liability and complex management. That’s why,
in order to run the corporation well, “internal rules” is absolutely needed.
These rules should cover some aspects such as the rights and equitable
treatment of shareholders, role of stakeholders, disclosure and transparency,
types and responsibilities of the board, capital structures, accounting
systems, reorganization clausules, and ownership structure and business group.
On the other hand, “external
regulation” embodies the relationship between one corporations / economic
actors and other corporations / economic actors. In that sense, “the rule of
games” should be addressed to avoid the emergence of monopolistic practices and
unfair business competition. In Japanese case after the World War II, Anti
Monopoly Act (1947) was enacted to limit, not to say to prohibit, the zaibatsu
or conglomeration. The basic goal of such law is to stimulate the creative
initiative of entrepreneur, to encourage business activities of enterprises, to
heighten the level of employment and people’s real income, and thereby to
promote the democratic and wholesome development of the nation economy as well
as to assure the interest of consumers in general. However, competition law
is not deliberately created to exclude competition within business practices
itself. Rather, it is concentrated on the way for maintaining the degree of
competition, so that companies can produce high quality product with faster and
more efficient methods.
From those two roles of law in
economic development, both internally and externally, we can conclude that two
benefits come together: productive and efficient process of economic / market
development on the one hand, and social advantages such as consumer and
environment protection, labor satisfaction, and even political stability on the
other hand.
June 26th, 2002
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar